PoshanSenseResearch papers are a lot to chew. We unpack the findings, keep the caveats, and bring the conversation back to everyday food.
Research 2017; guidance checked 2026
A US outbreak analysis explains why “natural” does not mean safer. Understand the model, its limits and current public-health advice without fear-based numbers.
Take a bite →
Research 2013 · 2015
A four-week UK trial found lower blood pressure with nitrate-rich beetroot juice. Learn what it measured, why other results differ and why juice is not a medication substitute.
Take a bite →
Research 2012 · 2015
Trials in Australia and Italy suggest modest blood-pressure effects from specific black-tea drinks. The answer depends on the comparison, duration and what your cup contains.
Take a bite →
Research 2023
A twelve-week mango crossover study found some microbiome changes but no clear improvement in several bowel symptoms. Learn what the experiment can and cannot tell you.
Take a bite →
Research 2015 · 2024
A 2024 trial found that nightly pistachios did not clearly improve fasting glucose in adults with prediabetes. Earlier work also separates diet quality from glucose treatment.
Take a bite →
Research 2011
A red-pepper experiment found small energy and intake effects, especially in people unaccustomed to spicy food. It did not test lasting weight loss.
Take a bite →
Research 2013
A small breakfast trial in late-adolescent girls found less evening snacking with a higher-protein meal, without lower daily intake than skipping breakfast.
Take a bite →
Research 2011 · 2012
Small US running and cycling trials found similar measured performance with raisins and commercial carbohydrate snacks. The evidence does not establish universal equivalence.
Take a bite →
Research 2018
The UK DROPLET trial found greater one-year weight loss with a supervised total-diet-replacement programme. It did not test an ordinary protein shake or an unsupported crash diet.
Take a bite →
Research 2023
A randomized community-garden trial offers promising behavioural results, but does not establish weight loss or a guaranteed extra serving of vegetables.
Take a bite →
Research 2017
A precise-looking number can still be an estimate. Laboratory validation separates heart-rate accuracy from energy-expenditure accuracy.
Take a bite →
Research 2021
Sleep-time estimates and sleep-stage estimates are different tests. A good-looking chart cannot diagnose a sleep disorder.
Take a bite →
Research 2023
Music before exercise can help some performance outcomes, but not every measure. Enjoyment and effort are separate questions.
Take a bite →
Research 2025
Small, poor-quality studies do not establish mouth taping as a safe sleep upgrade. Breathing problems need assessment, not a social-media workaround.
Take a bite →
Research 2021
Sugar-free gum may be a useful extra, but a review of bacterial counts does not establish cavity prevention or replace brushing.
Take a bite →These are educational explainers, drafted with AI assistance and checked against linked sources. They are not clinically reviewed. We combine complementary studies from 2010 onward to answer useful everyday questions. Publication date and data-collection date are different: recent papers can analyse older data. We include uncertain and null findings, not just exciting positive results.
How we read the evidence · Follow the RSS feed · Explore practical guides · Portion maths, with chai
The extra 508 calories: what a small feeding trial really tells us
Earlier evidence remains useful when read alongside newer work. This controlled food experiment is a useful starting point.