PoshanSenseResearch papers are a lot to chew. We unpack the findings, keep the caveats, and bring the conversation back to everyday food.
Research 2010, 2018 & 2025
Small trials suggest possible sleep benefits, but they do not justify an 84-minute promise or a cure for insomnia. Read the result behind the trend.
Take a bite →
Research 2025
A late walk and a demanding late workout are different questions. What a 2025 wearable study says about timing, strain and protecting bedtime.
Take a bite →
Research 2021
A nap can help alertness, but the benefit is not always immediate. Understand grogginess, uncertain memory claims and why naps cannot replace night sleep.
Take a bite →
Research 2010 & 2015
Small US and UK trials suggest a modest possible benefit alongside weight-management support. Water is not a fat burner, and more is not always better.
Take a bite →
Research 2023 & 2025 evidence update
The evidence is weaker than the viral promise. A retracted trial matters, newer reviews need checking, and small remaining studies do not justify a fat-loss routine.
Take a bite →
Research 2022
A small direct comparison found a trade-off, not a universal winner. Understand blood sugar, cholesterol and the foods each diet leaves out.
Take a bite →
Research 2015 & 2017
The food surrounding saturated fat can change the result. But better than butter is not the same as best for cholesterol—or unlimited cheese.
Take a bite →
Research 2021 & 2022
A large trial tested the daily-avocado claim directly. Its answer separates a nutritious ingredient from a promise to melt abdominal fat.
Take a bite →
Research 2015 & 2022
A large cocoa trial tested capsules, not chocolate bars. Understand the difference between a promising secondary finding and a proven daily-chocolate prescription.
Take a bite →
Research 2017 & 2018
A gluten-free label is not a general health upgrade. A Danish feeding study and long-term US evidence explain why the replacement foods matter.
Take a bite →
Research 2022 & 2024
Plant drinks can fit your diet, but the label matters: protein and fortification vary. Australian and Swiss studies explain what to compare.
Take a bite →
Research 2012, 2015 & 2016
Enjoying tea is different from taking a concentrated extract. Human trials and European safety assessment help separate small effects from marketing.
Take a bite →
Research 2013 & 2023
Prevention, symptom duration and starting a supplement after symptoms are different questions. Read what the full reviews actually found.
Take a bite →
Research 2016 & 2018
You do not need an imported shopping basket. Understand the evidence for a Mediterranean-style pattern, then adapt its everyday food choices without promising identical results.
Take a bite →
Research 2021, 2023 & 2025
Potassium-enriched salt has meaningful trial evidence, but it is not suitable for everyone. Separate replacing table salt, reducing sodium in food and individual safety.
Take a bite →These are educational explainers, drafted with AI assistance and checked against linked sources. They are not clinically reviewed. We combine complementary studies from 2010 onward to answer useful everyday questions. Publication date and data-collection date are different: recent papers can analyse older data. We include uncertain and null findings, not just exciting positive results.
How we read the evidence · Follow the RSS feed · Explore practical guides · Portion maths, with chai
The extra 508 calories: what a small feeding trial really tells us
Earlier evidence remains useful when read alongside newer work. This controlled food experiment is a useful starting point.