PoshanSenseResearch papers are a lot to chew. We unpack the findings, keep the caveats, and bring the conversation back to everyday food.
Research published 2021
BMI in India, Europe, Australia and the US: why the formula stays the same, and what a 2021 diabetes study tells us about different risk thresholds.
Take a bite →
Research published 2025
A 2025 review tested creatine alongside resistance training in older adults. What it found, what remains uncertain, and why it is not a personal dose recommendation.
Take a bite →
Research published 2025
Can plant protein support muscle? A 2025 trial compared plant-focused and animal-focused diets. Understand the findings before choosing a protein powder.
Take a bite →
Nature Communications · Paper published 2025-01-22
A 2025 Singapore trial makes legumes interesting—and shows why one ingredient cannot take all the credit.
Take a bite →
The BMJ · Paper published 2025-08-06
A 2025 analysis separates fries from other potatoes—and asks the often-missing question: what takes their place?
Take a bite →
JAMA Network Open · Paper published 2025-05-19
A 2025 cafeteria trial found no clear dietary improvement from a traffic-light menu-label programme.
Take a bite →
Scientific Reports · Paper published 2025-07-01
A 2025 review links whole-grain intake with lower hypertension risk, while leaving causality and exact portions uncertain.
Take a bite →
Nature Communications · Paper published 2025-04-08
A 2025 analysis explores daytime eating during simulated night work. It is not yet a meal plan for real shift workers.
Take a bite →
Gut Microbes · Paper published 2025-02-12
A 2025 yogurt study raises a subtype-specific question. It does not establish that yogurt prevents colorectal cancer.
Take a bite →
A worked example for converting calories per 100 grams into your actual portion, without mistaking a serving for the whole packet.
Read the guide →
A landmark 2019 feeding trial helps explain why food context matters. It does not tell you how many calories a packet adds to your day.
Read the archive →These are educational explainers, drafted with AI assistance and checked against linked sources. They are not clinically reviewed. We combine complementary studies from 2010 onward to answer useful everyday questions. Publication date and data-collection date are different: recent papers can analyse older data. We include uncertain and null findings, not just exciting positive results.
How we read the evidence · Follow the RSS feed · Explore practical guides · Portion maths, with chai
The extra 508 calories: what a small feeding trial really tells us
Earlier evidence remains useful when read alongside newer work. This controlled food experiment is a useful starting point.